ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Freedom of expression"

m (External links: * [http://www.jerf.org/writings/communicationEthics/node6.html Software and Software Patents], an essay that partly makes the freedom of speech argument)
(Discussing technology: Sharing source code is an important part of understanding a program. Patents cripple education by not allowing people to learn about software.)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
If something is patented, then you might not be able to publish a sensible discussion about it (See for example Andrew Tridgell's [http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/314 VFAT patch FAQ] on LKML, the Linux Kernel Mailing List).
 
If something is patented, then you might not be able to publish a sensible discussion about it (See for example Andrew Tridgell's [http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/26/314 VFAT patch FAQ] on LKML, the Linux Kernel Mailing List).
 +
 +
Sharing source code is an important part of understanding a program.  Patents cripple education by not allowing people to learn about software.
  
 
==Inducement worries==
 
==Inducement worries==

Revision as of 21:16, 4 August 2009

Software patents can interfere with people's freedom of expression in various ways.

Communication technology

Most modern communication technology is based on software. If only MyCompany can use a certain communication technology, then anyone who can't afford the software of MyCompany, or anyone who objects to using the software of MyCompany is excluded from certain types of communication.

For example: How many patents are violated by swpats.org?

Discussing technology

If something is patented, then you might not be able to publish a sensible discussion about it (See for example Andrew Tridgell's VFAT patch FAQ on LKML, the Linux Kernel Mailing List).

Sharing source code is an important part of understanding a program. Patents cripple education by not allowing people to learn about software.

Inducement worries

As described in the amicus brief by the American Civil Liberties Union,[1] because "inducement to infringement" is a crime in the USA, sharing technical information about a possibly-patented idea could lead to an infringement suit.

External links