ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Free software"

(External links: * [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040901004705872 Patents - Why Free/Open Source Software Might Have Less to Fear than Non-Free Software], by Dan Ravicher, Septemb)
(External links: * [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709519/000119312504155723/dex10109.htm A 2004 patent deal regarding StarOffice/OpenOffice.org], signed with Sun Microsystems ** 2010-)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
* [http://endsoftpatents.org/amicus-bilski-2009 FSF's amicus brief for the 2009 Supreme Court case], contains details of how free software is important and how it's affected
 
* [http://endsoftpatents.org/amicus-bilski-2009 FSF's amicus brief for the 2009 Supreme Court case], contains details of how free software is important and how it's affected
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040901004705872 Patents - Why Free/Open Source Software Might Have Less to Fear than Non-Free Software], by [[Dan Ravicher]], September 2004
 
* [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040901004705872 Patents - Why Free/Open Source Software Might Have Less to Fear than Non-Free Software], by [[Dan Ravicher]], September 2004
 +
* [http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709519/000119312504155723/dex10109.htm A 2004 patent deal regarding StarOffice/OpenOffice.org], signed with [[Sun Microsystems]]
 +
** 2010-03-09: [http://jonathanischwartz.wordpress.com/2010/03/09/good-artists-copy-great-artists-steal/ Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal], by Johnathan Schwartz of Sun Microsystems about patent threats from [[Apple]] and from [[Microsoft]] regarding OpenOffice.org
  
 
===Pages from GNU/Linux distributions===
 
===Pages from GNU/Linux distributions===

Revision as of 07:09, 10 March 2010

Free software is software which can be used, copied, redistributed, and whose source code can be viewed, modified, and also redistributed. See also:

"Free software" is not a subtopic of software patents. All types of software development carry the risk of patent infringement. The reason these two topics often appear together is that, firstly, the free software community is very active and vocal in campaigning against software patents, and secondly, software patents threaten a general freedom that free software users value: the freedom to participate in software development.

The term open source is a near-synonym. Patents affect the freedom that users and developers have when dealing with software. Patents don't affect "openness", so ESP Wiki should use the term "free software".

Why free software groups should be involved

The free software movement says that everyone should be allowed to modify and redistribute the software they use. Software patents interfere with this because they can add legal risks and costs to software development and distribution.

Patent promises in 2005

IBM promised, for 500 of its patents, not to use them against free software.[1]

Sun[2] and Nokia[3] subsequently made promises that were so narrow in scope, they were qualified as "empty" and "next to nothing", respectively, by Richard Stallman.[4]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Pages from GNU/Linux distributions

References