ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "European Patent Office grants software patents"

(Examples of granted software patents: put two "file names" patents together - must check some day if they're part of the same bunch)
(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: replace UPLS link with system that replaced it)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
 
* [[European Patent Convention]]
 
* [[European Patent Convention]]
 
* [[The Patented Webshop]]
 
* [[The Patented Webshop]]
* [[UPLS]] - a proposal from the [[European Commission]] which would create a centralised patent court that would probably uphold the EPO's software patents
+
* [[EU unitary patent and Unified Patent Court]]
 
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 
* [[Do software patents exist in my area]]?
 
* [[Software patents exist in Europe, mostly]]
 
* [[Software patents exist in Europe, mostly]]

Latest revision as of 04:40, 15 May 2014

This article lists examples of software patents granted by the European Patent Office (EPO) in spite of their repeated public claims of not granting software patents. You will also find links on this page to other collections of examples. You can find more using the instructions at Searching_for_patents#European_Patent_Office.

The EPO's public denial

Here's an example of a public statement from the EPO. This is from 2009:

The EPO does not grant "software patents". The term itself is a misleading concept. Under the EPC a computer program claimed as such is not a patentable invention (Art. 52(2)(c) and (3) EPC). Inventions involving computer programs that implement business, mathematical or similar methods and do not produce technical effects (e. g. because they solve a business problem rather than a technical one) are not patentable, and no patents will be granted for such inventions in Europe.[1]

Examples of granted software patents

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References