ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "EU software patents directive"
m (Reverted edits by Ezadetedek (talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
({{infobox europe}}) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{infobox europe}} |
| + | The '''EU software patents directive''' was a proposal by the [[European Commission]] to allow the patenting of software ideas in the [[European Union]]. The proposal was the subject of intense public debate and lobbying and was eventually rejected by the European Parliament in 2005 by a massive majority. | ||
==The proposal== | ==The proposal== | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
==Timeline== | ==Timeline== | ||
| − | * The [[European Commission]] published a proposal to introduce legislation which would clearly allow software ideas to be patentable | + | * February 2002: The [[European Commission]] published a proposal to introduce legislation which would clearly allow software ideas to be patentable |
* September 2003: [http://eupat.ffii.org/lisri/03/plen0924/index.en.html EU Parliament Votes for Real Limits on Patentability] | * September 2003: [http://eupat.ffii.org/lisri/03/plen0924/index.en.html EU Parliament Votes for Real Limits on Patentability] | ||
* 2004: [[Council of Ministers]] discards the European Parliament's amendments<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20071026105022/http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/Transcription</ref> | * 2004: [[Council of Ministers]] discards the European Parliament's amendments<ref>http://web.archive.org/web/20071026105022/http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/Transcription</ref> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 56: | ||
* [[Consultation Paper on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions]], 2000 | * [[Consultation Paper on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions]], 2000 | ||
* [[Software patents exist in Europe, mostly]] | * [[Software patents exist in Europe, mostly]] | ||
| − | * [[Corruption and bullying]] | + | * [[Corruption and bullying]] - François Mingarance listed as author of EC text |
===Some people involved=== | ===Some people involved=== | ||
| Line 81: | Line 82: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| − | + | {{reflist}} | |
| − | {{ | + | {{footer}} |
[[Category:European Union]] | [[Category:European Union]] | ||
[[Category:Documents]] | [[Category:Documents]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:36, 24 August 2012
The EU software patents directive was a proposal by the European Commission to allow the patenting of software ideas in the European Union. The proposal was the subject of intense public debate and lobbying and was eventually rejected by the European Parliament in 2005 by a massive majority.
Contents
The proposal
The European Patent Office (EPO) had already been granting software patents, despite "programs for computers" being excluded from patentability in the European Patent Convention. The European Commission's proposed legislation would have replaced the European Patent Convention with a directive which copied EPO practice. The European Commission and pro-software-patent lobby groups claimed that this was simple "harmonisation".
Timeline
- February 2002: The European Commission published a proposal to introduce legislation which would clearly allow software ideas to be patentable
- September 2003: EU Parliament Votes for Real Limits on Patentability
- 2004: Council of Ministers discards the European Parliament's amendments[1]
- June 2005: The European Parliament rejects the directive outright
Amendments
List of letters written to MEPs
(This list will be very long when completed, so will probably be split off into its own page.)
Who was involved
Organisations active against software patents
- FFII - the main campaign against software patents, to whom Europe owes a lot of thanks
- FSFE
- Opera Software
- Red Hat
- Sun Microsystems
- CEA-PME
- UEAPME
- eZ systems (they were in 2006[2] - were they active for the directive?)
Organisations active for software patents
- Campaign for Creativity
- EICTA
- Ericsson
- IBM
- Microsoft
- Nokia
- Philips
- SAP
- Siemens
- Eurochambres (or at least, some key members)
- UNICE
Organisations yet to be classified
- Google - represented by Mrs. Moll[3]
- Novell - only expressed itself once, in a completely ambiguous manner
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- EU 2005 proposed amendments - by the coalition against software patents
- Consultation Paper on the Patentability of Computer-Implemented Inventions, 2000
- Software patents exist in Europe, mostly
- Corruption and bullying - François Mingarance listed as author of EC text
Some people involved
Hundreds of people were involved, but to keep this list reasonable, these are the ones for whom ESP Wiki has articles:
External links
- A 2002 FAQ published by the European Parliament about the directive
- Political memory - record of who voted how in the 1st reading, September 2003
- French original: Letter from 33 scientists against software patents (English translations[?]: Google, bing translator)
- Reports: cnet, ecommercetimes
- Conflicts About Intellectual Property Claims: The Role and Function of Collective Action Networks - a paper about the lobbying on this directive
- Wikipedia: Proposed directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions
- FFII requests in order to clarify non-patentability of software, a 10 point summary by FFII
- Software patents : Timeline of Tim Jackson's correspondence - with MEPs from the UK
- http://nobananaunion.com - one of the many anti-software-patent sites
- http://www.european-patent-office.org/epo/dipl_conf/pdf/em00022.pdf - contains info about a 2000 attempt to introduce swpats
