ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

EPO EBoA referral G3-08

Revision as of 11:46, 14 May 2010 by Ciaran (talk | contribs) (The May 2010 decision: * Pages 40-99: this is the opinion, first published May 12th 2009)

Referral G3/08 is a set of questions sent by the president of the European Patent Office to the office's Enlarged Board of Appeals (EBoA). It is also called the Brimelow referral, after the then-president Alison Brimelow. The questions concerned the EPO's interpretation of Article 52 of the European Patent Convention regarding software patents.

The EBoA responded in May 2010 that there was nothing in the questions that they were able to answer. The questions posed were all "inadmissible". The response is 99 pages: G3_08_en.pdf.

A public consultation was held in early 2009 as part of the consultation process. (see Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08)

Questions of partiality

One amicus brief questioned the partiality of the board,[1] but the EPO disagreed and decided not to change the composition of the board.[2]

The May 2010 decision

  • Pages 1-23: reasons for the referal, written Oct 23rd 2008
  • Pages 24-28: the questions of the referal, Nov 11th 2008
  • Pages 29-39: partiality review declares self impartial, Oct 16th 2009
  • Pages 40-99: this is the opinion, first published May 12th 2009

The entire conclusion on page 99 is:

The referral of 22 October 2008 of points of law to the Enlarged Board of Appeal by the President of the EPO is inadmissible under Article 112(1)(b) EPC.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

epo.org links

After receiving the responses to the consultation, the EPO published information to repeat its claim that it doesn't grant software patents:

Third-party articles

Reactions to the May 2010 decision

References