en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

June 2014: US Supreme Court reining in software patents (Alice v. CLS)!

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Defensive Patent License

From en.swpat.org
Revision as of 08:51, 18 August 2010 by Ciaran (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

What this article documents is not a solution.
For information of the risks of putting too much work into these, see duds and non-solutions. See also: Abolition is the only solution.

The Defensive Patent License (DPL) is a project being worked on by Jason Schultz and Jennifer Urban, two law professors at UC Berkeley. It was first publicly discussed at a conference on May 7th 2010. Despite the name, it proposes a membership organisation, not a licence.

Contents

Overview

None of the details are finalised, but points being discussed include:[1]

  1. Member companies would have to commit all their patents. Not just a chosen set, not just the patents of one department/affiliate of the company. (This aspect is still the subject of a lot of discussion)
  2. Members give all other members an irrevocable licence to freely use their patents.
  3. Members can leave, but this would not cancel the licences already granted during their membership.

Related pages on en.swpat.org

External links

References

  1. http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/defensive-patent-license-makes-patents-less-e


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> EndSoftwarePatents.org - main site <<
>> News: news.swpat.org <<

This wiki is publicly-editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)