ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Cost of defending yourself against patent litigation"

(Effects: (See: Why software is different))
m (Reverted edits by 189.16.191.18 (talk) to last revision by Ciaran)
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
 +
==Patent Freedom's numbers==
 +
 +
* Full July 2009 report by [[Patent Freedom]] (16 pages): [http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2010/07/PatentFreedom.Presentation.7-9-10.pdf PatentFreedom.Presentation.7-9-10.pdf]
 +
* Overview article: [http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleFriendlyCC.jsp?id=1202464087434 Data Shows That Troll Problem Persists]
 +
 +
Some numbers:
 +
 +
* Dealing with a threat letter (an "assertion"): US$200,000.
 +
* Total costs incurred by defendants in 2009 in the [[USA]]: US$5 billion (excluding what was paid in settlements and judgements)
 +
 
==Effects==
 
==Effects==
 
(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)
 
(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)
  
 
In software, where practitioners are often individuals and [[SMEs]], the cost of defending oneself is impossible to pay.  The courts form a necessary form of checks and balances in the patent system, and if practitioners can't make use of the courts, the patents system doesn't work for those people.  There is thus no justice for software developers when they have to work within the patent system.  (See: [[Why software is different]])
 
In software, where practitioners are often individuals and [[SMEs]], the cost of defending oneself is impossible to pay.  The courts form a necessary form of checks and balances in the patent system, and if practitioners can't make use of the courts, the patents system doesn't work for those people.  There is thus no justice for software developers when they have to work within the patent system.  (See: [[Why software is different]])
 +
 +
===Even when you win you lose: Paltalk v. Jagex===
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
It is exceedingly unfortunate that the US legal system can force a company with a sole presence in Cambridge, UK to incur a seven-digit expense and waste over a year of management time on a case with absolutely no merit
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
====Subsection external links====
 +
 +
* http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/11/19/0550219
 +
* http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/31597/UKBased_RuneScape_Dev_Jagex_Wins_Patent_Infringement_Lawsuit.php
 +
 +
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
 +
* [[Invalid patents remain unchallenged]]
  
  
 
{{footer}}
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category: Costs]]
 
[[Category: Costs]]

Revision as of 11:46, 11 February 2011

Patent Freedom's numbers

Some numbers:

  • Dealing with a threat letter (an "assertion"): US$200,000.
  • Total costs incurred by defendants in 2009 in the USA: US$5 billion (excluding what was paid in settlements and judgements)

Effects

(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)

In software, where practitioners are often individuals and SMEs, the cost of defending oneself is impossible to pay. The courts form a necessary form of checks and balances in the patent system, and if practitioners can't make use of the courts, the patents system doesn't work for those people. There is thus no justice for software developers when they have to work within the patent system. (See: Why software is different)

Even when you win you lose: Paltalk v. Jagex

It is exceedingly unfortunate that the US legal system can force a company with a sole presence in Cambridge, UK to incur a seven-digit expense and waste over a year of management time on a case with absolutely no merit

Subsection external links

Related pages on ESP Wiki