ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Cost of defending yourself against patent litigation"

(Effects: (See: Why software is different))
(==Patent Freedom's numbers== * Full July 2009 report by Patent Freedom (16 pages): [http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2010/07/PatentFreedom.Presentation.7-9-10.pdf PatentFreedom.Presen)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
 +
==Patent Freedom's numbers==
 +
 +
* Full July 2009 report by [[Patent Freedom]] (16 pages): [http://thepriorart.typepad.com/the_prior_art/2010/07/PatentFreedom.Presentation.7-9-10.pdf PatentFreedom.Presentation.7-9-10.pdf]
 +
* Overview article: [http://www.law.com/jsp/cc/PubArticleFriendlyCC.jsp?id=1202464087434 Data Shows That Troll Problem Persists]
 +
 +
Some numbers:
 +
 +
* Dealing with a threat letter (an "assertion"): US$200,000.
 +
* Total costs incurred by defendants in 2009 in the [[USA]]: US$5 billion (excluding what was paid in settlements and judgements)
 +
 
==Effects==
 
==Effects==
 
(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)
 
(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)

Revision as of 18:30, 20 November 2010

Patent Freedom's numbers

Some numbers:

  • Dealing with a threat letter (an "assertion"): US$200,000.
  • Total costs incurred by defendants in 2009 in the USA: US$5 billion (excluding what was paid in settlements and judgements)

Effects

(This article is for documenting what the costs are, but I'd like to leave this note first.)

In software, where practitioners are often individuals and SMEs, the cost of defending oneself is impossible to pay. The courts form a necessary form of checks and balances in the patent system, and if practitioners can't make use of the courts, the patents system doesn't work for those people. There is thus no justice for software developers when they have to work within the patent system. (See: Why software is different)