ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Competition law defence"
m (Reverted edits by 167.206.140.130 (Talk) to last revision by Ciaran) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * IBM and TurboHercules, 2010) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* [[Interoperability exceptions]] - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability defence | * [[Interoperability exceptions]] - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability defence | ||
* [[Independent invention defence]] | * [[Independent invention defence]] | ||
| + | * [[IBM and TurboHercules, 2010]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 13:28, 26 July 2010
The competition law defence is a way of legally justifying a patent violation. If the patent holder has not offered to license the patent under fair terms, then in some jurisdictions, it's possible that violation can be legally justified by the competition law of that country.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Antitrust doesn't work
- Interoperability exceptions - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability defence
- Independent invention defence
- IBM and TurboHercules, 2010
