ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Competition law defence"
m (moved Competition law defense to Competition law defence: make syslink) |
m (typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''competition law | + | The '''competition law defence''' is a way of legally justifying a patent violation. If the patent holder has not offered to license the patent under fair terms, then in some jurisdictions, it's possible that violation can be legally justified by the competition law of that country. |
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
* [[Antitrust doesn't work]] | * [[Antitrust doesn't work]] | ||
| − | * [[Interoperability exceptions]] - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability | + | * [[Interoperability exceptions]] - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability defence |
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 00:12, 22 March 2010
The competition law defence is a way of legally justifying a patent violation. If the patent holder has not offered to license the patent under fair terms, then in some jurisdictions, it's possible that violation can be legally justified by the competition law of that country.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Antitrust doesn't work
- Interoperability exceptions - a useful goal would be to establish an interoperability defence
