ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08"
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/B1CF86E0AEEF557EC12575930047C1B5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sterckx_en.pdf Sterckx, Sigrid, Prof. Dr.] - '''anti-swpat''', but it's long and I didn't read all | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/B1CF86E0AEEF557EC12575930047C1B5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sterckx_en.pdf Sterckx, Sigrid, Prof. Dr.] - '''anti-swpat''', but it's long and I didn't read all | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/66007FA37972C52AC12575A60058570D/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Straus_en.pdf Straus, Joseph, Prof. Dr.] - at a glance, not clear | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/66007FA37972C52AC12575A60058570D/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Straus_en.pdf Straus, Joseph, Prof. Dr.] - at a glance, not clear | ||
| − | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/8A0071B81BDC05EFC12575A50054B1E5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sylvestris_en.pdf Sylvestris, T.] - explains that the referral is inadmissible, contains interesting discussion of previous cases | + | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/8A0071B81BDC05EFC12575A50054B1E5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sylvestris_en.pdf Sylvestris, T.] - explains that the referral is '''inadmissible''', contains interesting discussion of previous cases |
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/13110F41E4B5229AC12575A1004F05D3/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Thum_en.pdf Thum, Simon] - '''anti-swpat''', I think | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/13110F41E4B5229AC12575A1004F05D3/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Thum_en.pdf Thum, Simon] - '''anti-swpat''', I think | ||
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E793837D6565D7A6C12575A70050CF35/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Wessel_en.pdf Wessel, A.] - '''anti-swpat''' | * [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E793837D6565D7A6C12575A70050CF35/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Wessel_en.pdf Wessel, A.] - '''anti-swpat''' | ||
Revision as of 09:17, 2 May 2009
The following is information about briefs submitted in response to the European Patent Office's consultation EPO EBA referral G3-08.
The up to date list can be found at: http://www.epo.org/patents/appeals/eba-decisions/referrals/pending/briefs.html
Briefs that the EPO has already scanned and put online
- AIPPI - pro-swpat
- April - anti-swpat
- Bakels, R. - at a glance, not clearly for or against
- Balos, I. - neither for nor against, doesn't answer the questions
- Bayer, C. - anti-swpat
- BIKT et al - in German, says swpat are anti-constitutional under German law
- Butler, M.J. - pro-swpat, I think
- Canonical Group Ltd. - anti-swpat
- Combeau, J. - mixed
- Cowsley, C. - anti-swpat by intention, but some statements see misinterpretable
- De Keyzer - anti-swpat
- Duhme,Torsten, Dr. - pro-swpat
- epi - pro-swpat, but in a weak way
- FFII Sweden - anti-swpat
- FSFE(epo.org scan) - anti-swpat
- G-N-U GmbH - in German, probably anti-swpat
- Gustavson, Stefan - anti-swpat, but some statements seem misinterpretable
- Hallén, Jacob - anti-swpat
- HISPALINUX - anti-swpat
- IBM - pro-swpat "novel logic arrangements that can be implemented otherwise than as a computer program are therefore not necessarily excluded by Article 52."
- IIPCT - pro-swpat, a patent consultant writing on behalf of 7 SMEs
- Illuminet - anti-swpat
- intellect - pro-swpat
- IZGSE - pro-swpat, but to honest, not to be from an anti-swpatter
- JIPA - pro-swpat
- Lawrence, William - anti-swpat
- Nullmeier, M. - unclear
- Philips - pro-swpat
- Piratenpartei - in German
- Piratpartiet - refuses to answer the questions
- ScriptumLibre - unsure. Seemingly anti-swpat, but there are some strange sentences
- Sterckx, Sigrid, Prof. Dr. - anti-swpat, but it's long and I didn't read all
- Straus, Joseph, Prof. Dr. - at a glance, not clear
- Sylvestris, T. - explains that the referral is inadmissible, contains interesting discussion of previous cases
- Thum, Simon - anti-swpat, I think
- Wessel, A. - anti-swpat
Briefs submitted but not yet on the EPO's site
- End Software Patents
- Red Hat
- FFII submitted a brief (separate from that of FFII Sweden)
- IFSO.ie submitted a brief
- tmplab
