ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Briefs submitted to EPO EBoA G3-08"

(Replaced content with 'http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8060&y7=1 [url=http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8054&y7=1]cheap fioricet[/url] <a href="http://www.livescribe.com/f…')
Line 1: Line 1:
{{navbox}}
+
http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8060&y7=1 [url=http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8054&y7=1]cheap fioricet[/url] <a href="http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8059&y7=1">cialis</a> <a href=http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8056&y7=1>cheap tramadol</a> [url="http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8055&y7=1"]diazepam[/url] [LINK http://www.livescribe.com/forums/member.php?u=8058&y7=1]free viagra[/LINK] dmqn
The following is information about briefs submitted in response to the [[European Patent Office]]'s consultation [[EPO EBA referral G3-08]].
 
 
 
Official list: http://www.epo.org/patents/appeals/eba-decisions/pending/briefs.html
 
 
 
==Briefs that the EPO has already scanned and put online==
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/315C1D200F352432C12575A8004CCCA9/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_AIPPI.pdf AIPPI] - '''pro-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/3EC5756CD82EBFE2C12575A800508DF1/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_April_en.pdf April] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/DD183CB73B24B85FC12575A60030B9A0/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Bakels_en.pdf Bakels, R.] - at a glance, not clearly for or against
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/00B7846123D9CB11C12575A50054CC03/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Balos_en.pdf Balos, I.] - neither for nor against, doesn't answer the questions
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/88E41290F27249E7C12575A600309751/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Bayer_en.pdf Bayer, C.] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/F336CC96BA367AFBC12575A70050874C/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_BIKT_et_al.pdf BIKT et al] - in German, says '''swpat are anti-constitutional''' under German law
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/CC5275333722ED51C12575A800509928/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Butler_en.pdf Butler, M.J.] - '''pro-swpat''', I think
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E0F5D7502F1D0BECC12575A80050A0A5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Canonical_en.pdf Canonical Group Ltd.] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/4C3493A03E462C2AC12575A70050A73B/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Combeau_en.pdf Combeau, J.] - mixed
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/5F5D8FE365EFC516C12575A600308CF3/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Cowsley_en.pdf Cowsley, C.] - '''anti-swpat''' by intention, but some statements see misinterpretable
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/4C39B08E53F14291C12575A50054BD55/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_De_Keyzer_en.pdf De Keyzer] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/9C6219B3ACBE94ACC12575A2004F906C/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Duhme_en.pdf Duhme,Torsten, Dr.] - '''pro-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/437C033B3F451BD0C12575A50054C3C4/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_epi_en.pdf epi] - '''pro-swpat''', '''pro-technical''' but in a weak way
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/54A467217827BCF3C12575A8004B7A73/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_FFII-Sweden_en.pdf FFII Sweden] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://fsfe.org/projects/swpat/epo-response-042009.html FSFE]([http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/78E2DA9BB606AE6AC12575A8004C9AFD/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_fsfe_en.pdf epo.org scan]) - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/3BC1E7BB56366BB6C12575A8004B8148/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_G-N-U_GmbH_de.pdf G-N-U GmbH] - in German, '''probably anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/67C29CFB4FEE4A89C125759E002A510B/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Gustavson_en.pdf Gustavson, Stefan] - '''anti-swpat''', but some statements seem misinterpretable
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/45D90730515B72FCC125757F005A2A43/$File/G308_Amicus_Curiae_Briefs_Jacob_Hallen_en.pdf Hallén, Jacob] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/4CD351E6F6E0D95EC12575A1004F3FB7/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_HISPALINUX_en.pdf HISPALINUX] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/24FAF7F604450797C12575A70050B09F/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_IBM_en.pdf IBM] - '''pro-swpat''' "''novel logic arrangements that can be implemented otherwise than as a computer program are therefore not necessarily excluded by Article 52.''"
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/055BC849C259CDA8C12575A8004C9065/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_IIPCT_en.pdf IIPCT] - '''pro-swpat''', a patent consultant writing on behalf of 7 SMEs from the Microsoft lobby community
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/B6422936A875F68AC12575A8004B70FE/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Illuminet_en.pdf Illuminet] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/BF6F50184668E0F1C12575A70050C2BD/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_intellect_en.pdf intellect] - '''pro-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/BE304575ADED4A70C12575A8004CACF8/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_IZSGE_en.pdf IZGSE] - pro-swpat, but to honest, not to be from an anti-swpatter
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/AF990D19F2EB1754C12575A8004B6715/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_JIPA_en.pdf JIPA] - '''pro-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/1C61E0A5C6F0B3BCC125759F0026D357/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Lawrence_en.pdf Lawrence, William] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/3C9AD04E510A53C8C12575A8004CA2EB/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Nullmeier_en.pdf Nullmeier, M.] - unclear
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/73BC38A8FB366767C125755900540B15/$File/G3-08_Philips_en.pdf Philips] - '''pro-swpat'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/7C9E210602E61E46C12575A60030B146/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Piratenpartei_de.pdf Piratenpartei] - in German
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E3BBC8DB5F059AB5C12575A60030D18D/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Piratpartiet_en.pdf Piratpartiet] - '''inadmissable''', anti-technical, refuses to answer the questions
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/DEB23949237A32CBC125759F00541DE7/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_ScriptumLibre_en.pdf ScriptumLibre] - unsure. Seemingly anti-swpat, but there are some strange sentences
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/B1CF86E0AEEF557EC12575930047C1B5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sterckx_en.pdf Sterckx, Sigrid, Prof. Dr.] - '''anti-swpat''', but it's long and I didn't read all
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/66007FA37972C52AC12575A60058570D/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Straus_en.pdf Straus, Joseph, Prof. Dr.] - '''inadmissable'''
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/8A0071B81BDC05EFC12575A50054B1E5/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Sylvestris_en.pdf Sylvestris, T.] - explains that the referral is '''inadmissible''', contains interesting discussion of previous cases
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/13110F41E4B5229AC12575A1004F05D3/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Thum_en.pdf Thum, Simon] - '''anti-swpat''', I think
 
* [http://documents.epo.org/projects/babylon/eponet.nsf/0/E793837D6565D7A6C12575A70050CF35/$File/G3-08_amicus_curiae_brief_Wessel_en.pdf Wessel, A.] - '''anti-swpat'''
 
 
 
==Briefs submitted but not yet on the EPO's site==
 
* [http://endsoftpatents.org/local--files/esp-epo-2009/esp-epo-2009.pdf End Software Patents]
 
* [http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/written-statement-in-case-g.pdf Red Hat]
 
* FFII submitted a brief (separate from that of FFII Sweden)
 
* IFSO.ie submitted a brief
 
* [http://www.tmplab.org/2009/04/30/does-epo-grant-illegal-software-patents/ tmplab]
 
 
 
==External links==
 
* [http://www.ipjur.com/blog2/index.php?/archives/70-Still-More-Amicus-Curiae-Briefs-Submitted-to-Registrar-of-Enlarged-Board-Of-Appeal-in-Case-G308.html ipjur.com looks at trends in the submitted briefs]
 
 
 
 
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Documents]]
 
[[Category:European Union]]
 
[[Category:Campaigning]]
 

Revision as of 08:39, 3 June 2010