Difference between revisions of "Blocking competing software"
(→See also: * Used for sabotage rather than competition) |
(→External links: * [http://web.archive.org/web/20080120220500/http://noedupatents.org/ No Education Patents], archive.org copy ''(see also: Harm to education)'') |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
| − | * [http://web.archive.org/web/20080120220500/http://noedupatents.org/ No Education Patents], archive.org copy | + | |
| + | * [http://web.archive.org/web/20080120220500/http://noedupatents.org/ No Education Patents], archive.org copy ''(see also: [[Harm to education]])'' | ||
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4790485.stm BBC article about BlackBoard's patents], 2006 | * [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4790485.stm BBC article about BlackBoard's patents], 2006 | ||
* [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/0/3BDE72837B1DD5BBCC256F9C0070E506 Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market], 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic. | * [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/0/3BDE72837B1DD5BBCC256F9C0070E506 Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market], 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic. | ||
| + | {{page footer}} | ||
[[Category:Why it matters]] | [[Category:Why it matters]] | ||
[[Category:Arguments]] | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
| − | |||
Revision as of 08:32, 24 February 2010
Software patents prevent multiple teams from innovating in the same field. So instead of ten word processors, you'll only have two.
This factor is particularly important in the software field because the software industry already has a strong tendency towards the creation of natural monopolies, partly due to the cost of competing with an established incumbent, and partly due to the natural desire of users to adopt the products that they see a majority of other users using, because of the benefits this brings in terms of interoperability and adoption costs.
For new entrants to the market, interoperability with established products is often a precondition of success. Patents can make such interoperability much harder (sometimes impossible) to achieve.
Higher prices
The cost of all these patents has to be paid by someone, often the users.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Preventing competition - lowering quality, raising prices
- Used for sabotage rather than competition
External links
- No Education Patents, archive.org copy (see also: Harm to education)
- BBC article about BlackBoard's patents, 2006
- Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market, 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic.
