ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Blocking competing software"
m ([http://web.archive.org/web/20080120220500/http://noedupatents.org/ No Education Patents], archive.org copy * [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4790485.stm BBC article about BlackBoard's patents]) |
m (→External links: {{page footer}}) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Why it matters]] | [[Category:Why it matters]] | ||
[[Category:Arguments]] | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
| + | {{page footer}} | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 28 August 2009
Software patents prevent multiple teams from innovating in the same field. So instead of ten word processors, you'll only have two.
Higher prices
The cost of all these patents has to be paid by someone, often the users.
See also
- Preventing competition - lowering quality, raising prices
External links
- No Education Patents, archive.org copy
- BBC article about BlackBoard's patents, 2006
- Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market, 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic.
