ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Blocking competing software"

({{navbox}})
(* [http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=3818 Apple-Samsung patent fight is not about pushing competition off the market], 28 June 2012, '''IPeg''' - a strange article which defends software patents by saying that t)
(12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{navbox}}Software patents prevent multiple teams from innovating in the same field.  So instead of ten word processors, you'll only have two.
+
:''(For the general impediment to entering the software market, see [[Cost barrier to market entry]].)''
 +
 
 +
[[Software patents]] prevent multiple teams from innovating in the same field, and prevent multiple teams from providing the same functionality.  So instead of ten word processors, you'll only have two.
  
 
This factor is particularly important in the software field because the software industry already has a strong tendency towards the creation of natural monopolies, partly due to the cost of competing with an established incumbent, and partly due to the natural desire of users to adopt the products that they see a majority of other users using, because of the benefits this brings in terms of interoperability and adoption costs.
 
This factor is particularly important in the software field because the software industry already has a strong tendency towards the creation of natural monopolies, partly due to the cost of competing with an established incumbent, and partly due to the natural desire of users to adopt the products that they see a majority of other users using, because of the benefits this brings in terms of interoperability and adoption costs.
Line 6: Line 8:
  
 
==Higher prices==
 
==Higher prices==
 +
 
The cost of all these patents has to be paid by someone, often the users.
 
The cost of all these patents has to be paid by someone, often the users.
 +
 +
==Studies supporting this==
 +
 +
[[Gowers Review of Intellectual Property]]:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
The evidence suggests software patents are used strategically; that is, to prevent competitors from developing in a similar field, rather than to incentivise innovation
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
  
* [[Preventing competition]] - lowering quality, raising prices
+
* [[Cost barrier to market entry]] - lowering quality, raising prices
 
* [[Used for sabotage rather than competition]]
 
* [[Used for sabotage rather than competition]]
 +
* [[Patenting around what will become essential]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 18: Line 29:
 
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4790485.stm BBC article about BlackBoard's patents], 2006
 
* [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4790485.stm BBC article about BlackBoard's patents], 2006
 
* [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/0/3BDE72837B1DD5BBCC256F9C0070E506 Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market], 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic.
 
* [http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/0/3BDE72837B1DD5BBCC256F9C0070E506 Tokyo court orders popular word processor off market], 2005, the main competitor to Microsoft Word in Japan is removed from the market due to patents owned by Matsushita Electric Industrial, aka Panasonic.
 +
* [http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20101025PD218.html Microsoft to charge royalty fees to prevent Acer, Asustek from using Android in netbooks, say Taiwan makers], 26 Oct 2010, '''Digitimes'''
 +
* [http://www.ipeg.eu/?p=3818 Apple-Samsung patent fight is not about pushing competition off the market], 28 June 2012, '''IPeg''' - a strange article which defends software patents by saying that they're a tool for impeding competitors!?
  
  
{{page footer}}
+
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:Why it matters]]
 
[[Category:Why it matters]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]

Revision as of 04:25, 3 August 2012

(For the general impediment to entering the software market, see Cost barrier to market entry.)

Software patents prevent multiple teams from innovating in the same field, and prevent multiple teams from providing the same functionality. So instead of ten word processors, you'll only have two.

This factor is particularly important in the software field because the software industry already has a strong tendency towards the creation of natural monopolies, partly due to the cost of competing with an established incumbent, and partly due to the natural desire of users to adopt the products that they see a majority of other users using, because of the benefits this brings in terms of interoperability and adoption costs.

For new entrants to the market, interoperability with established products is often a precondition of success. Patents can make such interoperability much harder (sometimes impossible) to achieve.

Higher prices

The cost of all these patents has to be paid by someone, often the users.

Studies supporting this

Gowers Review of Intellectual Property:

The evidence suggests software patents are used strategically; that is, to prevent competitors from developing in a similar field, rather than to incentivise innovation

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links