ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Antitrust law"
m (→External links: Category:non-solutions) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Competition law defense) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
* [[Palliatives and failed remedies]] | * [[Palliatives and failed remedies]] | ||
| + | * [[Competition law defense]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 21:42, 5 January 2010
History has shown that antitrust law and other laws to protect competition don't work against problems caused by patents.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
External links
- US Federal Trade Commission gives up antitrust proceedings against Rambus for using patents against companies it negotiated standards with
- US FTC report, 2007 (I haven't read this, maybe it's not relevant)
- YouTube video of EU Commissioner for Competition admitting that the EU ruling doesn't prevent Microsoft from demanding royalties
