ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Antitrust law"
m (→External links: * [http://www.ftc.gov/reports/innovation/P040101PromotingInnovationandCompetitionrpt0704.pdf US FTC report, 2007] (I haven't read this, maybe it's not relevant)) |
m (→External links: * Palliatives and failed remedies) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
History has shown that '''antitrust law''' and other laws to protect competition don't work against problems caused by patents. | History has shown that '''antitrust law''' and other laws to protect competition don't work against problems caused by patents. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
+ | * [[Palliatives and failed remedies]] | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Category:Arguments]] | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
+ | {{page footer}} |
Revision as of 06:21, 8 October 2009
History has shown that antitrust law and other laws to protect competition don't work against problems caused by patents.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
External links
- US Federal Trade Commission gives up antitrust proceedings against Rambus for using patents against companies it negotiated standards with
- US FTC report, 2007 (I haven't read this, maybe it's not relevant)
This entry is a stub.
The information provided is too short. You can help us by expanding it and adding appropriate sources.