ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Antitrust law"
m ([http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/05/14/ftc_drops_rambus_antitrust_case/ US Federal Trade Commission gives up antitrust proceedings against Rambus for using patents against companies it negotiate) |
Steelpillow (talk | contribs) (stub, categorise) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
* [http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/05/14/ftc_drops_rambus_antitrust_case/ US Federal Trade Commission gives up antitrust proceedings against Rambus for using patents against companies it negotiated standards with] | * [http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/05/14/ftc_drops_rambus_antitrust_case/ US Federal Trade Commission gives up antitrust proceedings against Rambus for using patents against companies it negotiated standards with] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{stub}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Arguments]] | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 16 June 2009
History has shown that antitrust law and other laws to protect competition don't work against problems caused by patents.
External links
This entry is a stub.
The information provided is too short. You can help us by expanding it and adding appropriate sources.
