ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Analyses of the patentability of specific ideas"

(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Computer simulations and representations)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
* [[digital camera image processing example]] - if a photographer could do it them self, is it software?
 
* [[digital camera image processing example]] - if a photographer could do it them self, is it software?
 
* [[Cabinet for the blind]] - does it matter if the reading cabinet contains hardware, software, or a human?
 
* [[Cabinet for the blind]] - does it matter if the reading cabinet contains hardware, software, or a human?
 +
* [[Is resource usage technical]]? - if it makes computer hardware use less resources?
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==

Latest revision as of 08:10, 30 January 2012

Examples are very important for testing legal wordings. If you want to propose a test that should exclude software from patentability, you need to check it against at least these examples:

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External analyses

If someone finds it worthwhile, wiki pages might be written about some of the analyses linked below. So if something disappears, take a look in the category.