ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Analyses of the patentability of specific ideas"
(* Cabinet for the blind - does it matter if the reading cabinet contains hardware, software, or a human?) |
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Pen and paper patents) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [[Analogies]] | * [[Analogies]] | ||
| + | * [[Pen and paper patents]] | ||
* [[CSIRO wifi patent]] - a hardware or a software patent? [http://news.swpat.org/2010/06/csiro-wifi-a-hardware-or-a-software-patent/ forum] | * [[CSIRO wifi patent]] - a hardware or a software patent? [http://news.swpat.org/2010/06/csiro-wifi-a-hardware-or-a-software-patent/ forum] | ||
* [[Example software patents]] - reading software patents might give ideas for how to spot others | * [[Example software patents]] - reading software patents might give ideas for how to spot others | ||
Revision as of 10:22, 26 October 2010
Examples are very important for testing legal wordings. If you want to propose a test that should exclude software from patentability, you need to check it against at least these examples:
- Anti-lock braking example - software-implemented or software controlled?
- mp3 audio example - are audio signals "applied natural science"?
- digital camera image processing example - if a photographer could do it them self, is it software?
- Cabinet for the blind - does it matter if the reading cabinet contains hardware, software, or a human?
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Analogies
- Pen and paper patents
- CSIRO wifi patent - a hardware or a software patent? forum
- Example software patents - reading software patents might give ideas for how to spot others
External analyses
If someone finds it worthwhile, wiki pages might be written about some of the analyses linked below. So if something disappears, take a look in the category.
- FFII: Sennheiser's patents still valid, regarding infra-red audio communication
- FFII: Tomography patents still valid
- FFII: Automatable medical diagnosis
