ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "Analyses of the patentability of specific ideas"
(→Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: rm 2) |
({{navbox}}) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Examples are very important for testing [[legal wordings]]. If you want to propose a test that should exclude software from patentability, you need to check it against at least these examples: | + | {{navbox}}Examples are very important for testing [[legal wordings]]. If you want to propose a test that should exclude software from patentability, you need to check it against at least these examples: |
* [[Anti-lock braking example]] | * [[Anti-lock braking example]] | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 30 March 2010
Examples are very important for testing legal wordings. If you want to propose a test that should exclude software from patentability, you need to check it against at least these examples:
Related pages on ESP Wiki
External analyses
If someone finds it worthwhile, wiki pages might be written about some of the analyses linked below. So if something disappears, take a look in the category.
- FFII: Sennheiser's patents still valid, regarding infra-red audio communication
- FFII: Tomography patents still valid
- FFII: Automatable medical diagnosis
