ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Analogies"

m (Minefield: This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, you know it, but when you violate a patent, the patent holder might threaten you immediately, or might decide to let you continu)
(added music and rms links)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, you know it, but when you violate a patent, the patent holder might threaten you immediately, or might decide to let you continue to build you project on that idea and then threaten you.
 
This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, you know it, but when you violate a patent, the patent holder might threaten you immediately, or might decide to let you continue to build you project on that idea and then threaten you.
  
==Literary patents==
+
==Literature==
 
Again citing Richard Stallman:
 
Again citing Richard Stallman:
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html
 +
 +
==Music==
 +
Again citing Richard Stallman:
 +
* http://www.ariel.com.au/a/rms-unsw.html
 +
* http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/buzz/stories/s1226098.htm
 +
* http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-121749.html (2nd last section, "If symphonies were patented")

Revision as of 10:26, 20 April 2009

Sometimes analogies help to explain this to people new to the area.

Minefield

Richard Stallman has frequently mentioned this analogy in parts of his speeches:

This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, you know it, but when you violate a patent, the patent holder might threaten you immediately, or might decide to let you continue to build you project on that idea and then threaten you.

Literature

Again citing Richard Stallman:

Music

Again citing Richard Stallman: