ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Analogies"

(Music: * http://news.swpat.org/2010/01/toll-booths-analogy/)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
==Minefield==
 
==Minefield==
Richard Stallman has frequently mentioned this analogy in parts of his speeches:
+
[[Richard Stallman]] has frequently mentioned this analogy in parts of his speeches:
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-mec-india.html
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-mec-india.html
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fighting-software-patents.html
 
* http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/fighting-software-patents.html

Revision as of 12:47, 4 January 2010

Sometimes analogies help to explain this to people new to the area.

Minefield

Richard Stallman has frequently mentioned this analogy in parts of his speeches:

With each step, probably nothing happens, but you have to take so many steps, there's no chance of getting across the minefield without stepping on one.

This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, the damage is instant. When you violate a patent, the patent holder may be aware and might threaten you immediately, or they might decide to let you continue to build your project on that idea and then threaten you later, or they might not be aware now but they will threaten you later when they become aware. This happens most consequently regarding standards. In this way, even if you get across the minefield, you still don't have certainty that you won't get blown up.

Literature

Richard Stallman:

Timothy B. Lee, of The Cato Institute:

Music

Software is not unlike music. Writing software or music is a purely intellectual process, though both require some kind of machine to lend them expression. In both fields, very few individuals ever come up with totally original ideas, yet every composer or programmer has minor new ideas every day. In both fields, the ideas are highly abstract: how would one describe the idea of taking a musical theme and writing variations on it in patent lawyers' language? In both fields, independent invention without copying is not only a theoretical possibility, it happens frequently. In both fields, the test of what is "obvious" is completely subjective. Music, fortunately, is not troubled by patents. But this does not seem to have prevented composers from innovating.

By Chris Lale, January 2003:

Again citing Richard Stallman:

Toll booths on roads

Ciaran O'Riordan's explanation of how "software patents are like toll booths, at best, and road blocks, at worst":