ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Analogies"

m (Minefield: With each step, probably nothing happens, but you have to take so many steps, there's no chance of getting across the minefield without stepping on one.)
m (Music: * [http://web.archive.org/web/20050405135357/http://www.coolscience.co.uk/free-software/software-patent-music.html Software patents – a musical analogy])
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Music==
 
==Music==
 +
By Chris Lale, January 2003:
 +
* [http://web.archive.org/web/20050405135357/http://www.coolscience.co.uk/free-software/software-patent-music.html Software patents – a musical analogy]
 +
 
Again citing Richard Stallman:
 
Again citing Richard Stallman:
 
* http://www.ariel.com.au/a/rms-unsw.html
 
* http://www.ariel.com.au/a/rms-unsw.html
Line 24: Line 27:
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Arguments]]
 
[[Category:Understanding the patent system]]
 
[[Category:Understanding the patent system]]
 +
{{page footer}}

Revision as of 21:16, 30 August 2009

Sometimes analogies help to explain this to people new to the area.

Minefield

Richard Stallman has frequently mentioned this analogy in parts of his speeches:

This analogy omits one aspect: when you step on a mine, the damage is instant. When you violate a patent, the patent holder be aware and might threaten you immediately, or they might decide to let you continue to build you project on that idea and then threaten you later, or they might not be aware now but they will threaten you later when they become aware. This happens most consequently regarding standards.

With each step, probably nothing happens, but you have to take so many steps, there's no chance of getting across the minefield without stepping on one.

Literature

Again citing Richard Stallman:

Music

By Chris Lale, January 2003:

Again citing Richard Stallman: