ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "An Empirical Look at Software Patents"

m ([http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=461701 The paper's homepage on Social Science Research Network])
 
m (minor cleanups)
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
:''('''NOTE:''' The information on this page, unless otherwise stated, is from the 2004 working version of the report which is freely available online.  If you have a copy of the 2007 final version, it would be very useful if you could add information to this page and check that the information here isn't modified in the final version.  Thanks.)''
 +
 
'''An Empirical Look at Software Patents''' is a paper jointly published in March 2004 by:
 
'''An Empirical Look at Software Patents''' is a paper jointly published in March 2004 by:
* James E. Bessen, Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law
+
* [[James Bessen on software patents|James E. Bessen]], Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law
* Robert M. Hunt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
+
* [[Robert Hunt on software patents|Robert M. Hunt]], Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
 +
 
 +
A version tagged "Working Paper" was published freely online in 2004 and is by far the most referenced version.  The final version was published in 2007 but is not freely available.
  
 
==Interesting parts==
 
==Interesting parts==
 +
From the Abstract:
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
''<nowiki>[...]</nowiki>The very large increase in software patent propensity over time is not adequately explained by changes in R&D investments, employment of computer programmers, or productivity growth. <nowiki>[...]</nowiki> We find evidence that software patents substitute for R&D at the firm level; they are associated with lower R&D intensity<nowiki>[...]</nowiki>''
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 
Page 37 claims that the [[USPTO]] grants 70 software patents per day.
 
Page 37 claims that the [[USPTO]] grants 70 software patents per day.
 +
 +
From the conclusion:
 +
 +
<blockquote>
 +
''For industries like software or computer, there is actually good reason to believe that imitation becomes a spur to innovation, while strong patents become an impediment''
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=461701 The paper's homepage on Social Science Research Network]
+
* [http://ssrn.com/abstract=957925 The final version, Spring 2007] - for sale only
 +
* [http://ssrn.com/abstract=461701 The 2004 draft of the paper] - freely downloadable
 +
* [http://www.researchoninnovation.org/softpat.pdf The Software Patent Experiment], an article published at the same time by the same two authors
 +
* [http://www.researchineurope.org/policy/hahn_wallsten.pdf A Review of Bessen and Hunt's Analysis of Software Patents] by American Enterprise Institute's Robert Hahn and Scott Wallsten
 +
* [http://www.researchoninnovation.org/hahn.pdf Bessen and Hunt's reply to Hahn and Wallsten]
 +
 
  
[[Category:Reports and studies]]
+
{{footer}}
[[Category:USA]]
+
[[Category: Reports and studies]]
 +
[[Category: USA]]

Latest revision as of 14:26, 21 October 2014

(NOTE: The information on this page, unless otherwise stated, is from the 2004 working version of the report which is freely available online. If you have a copy of the 2007 final version, it would be very useful if you could add information to this page and check that the information here isn't modified in the final version. Thanks.)

An Empirical Look at Software Patents is a paper jointly published in March 2004 by:

A version tagged "Working Paper" was published freely online in 2004 and is by far the most referenced version. The final version was published in 2007 but is not freely available.

Interesting parts

From the Abstract:

[...]The very large increase in software patent propensity over time is not adequately explained by changes in R&D investments, employment of computer programmers, or productivity growth. [...] We find evidence that software patents substitute for R&D at the firm level; they are associated with lower R&D intensity[...]

Page 37 claims that the USPTO grants 70 software patents per day.

From the conclusion:

For industries like software or computer, there is actually good reason to believe that imitation becomes a spur to innovation, while strong patents become an impediment

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links