ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "An Empirical Look at Software Patents"

m (Interesting parts: From the conclusion:)
m (External links: * [http://www.researchineurope.org/policy/hahn_wallsten.pdf A Review of Bessen and Hunt's Analysis of Software Patents] by American Enterprise Institute's Robert Hahn and Scott Wa)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=461701 The paper's homepage on Social Science Research Network]
 
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=461701 The paper's homepage on Social Science Research Network]
 +
* [http://www.researchineurope.org/policy/hahn_wallsten.pdf A Review of Bessen and Hunt's Analysis of Software Patents] by American Enterprise Institute's Robert Hahn and Scott Wallsten
 +
* [http://www.researchoninnovation.org/hahn.pdf Bessen and Hunt's reply to Hahn and Wallsten]
 +
 +
  
 
[[Category:Reports and studies]]
 
[[Category:Reports and studies]]
 
[[Category:USA]]
 
[[Category:USA]]

Revision as of 06:51, 22 May 2009

An Empirical Look at Software Patents is a paper jointly published in March 2004 by:

  • James E. Bessen, Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law
  • Robert M. Hunt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Interesting parts

From the Abstract:

"[...]The very large increase in software patent propensity over time is not adequately explained by changes in R&D investments, employment of computer programmers, or productivity growth. [...] We find evidence that software patents substitute for R&D at the firm level; they are associated with lower R&D intensity[...]

Page 37 claims that the USPTO grants 70 software patents per day.

From the conclusion:

"For industries like software or computer, there is actually good reason to believe that imitation becomes a spur to innovation, while strong patents become an impediment"

See also

External links