ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "America Invents Act"

(I've moved the first-to-invent text to its own article: First-to-file or first-to-invent)
(Senate committee hearings)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
* [http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/06/ip-experts-question-patent-reform-provisions.html IP Experts Question Patent Reform Provisions], June 15<sup>th</sup> 2010
 
* [http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2010/06/ip-experts-question-patent-reform-provisions.html IP Experts Question Patent Reform Provisions], June 15<sup>th</sup> 2010
  
===Senate committee hearings===
+
Now we know who the sesnbile one is here. Great post!
 
 
* http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=3701 (March 10th 2009)
 
* http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=2803 (June 6th 2007)
 
 
 
 
 
{{footer}}
 
[[Category:USA]]
 

Revision as of 08:45, 2 May 2011

In the USA, The Patent Reform Act is legislation that was proposed in 2007. It was rejected in the Senate in 2008 but discussions began again in 2009 and continued in 2010.

This proposal does not deliver the real reform we need - it would not end or even reduce the granting of software patents by the USPTO. We need to change what can be patented - what areas are "patentable subject matter", to have software removed. This reform might reduce the problem of patent trolls, but won't have any effect on the harm to standards or on MPEG video formats.

It is generally proposed to change the USA's granting system from first-to-invent to first-to-file, like the rest of the world.

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

Now we know who the sesnbile one is here. Great post!