ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Amazon's one-click shopping patent"

m (* [http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000312mag-patents.html Patently absurd], a 2000 article in the New York Times)
m (External links: * Litigation and specific patents)
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
In 2006 Cordance Corp., who have an earlier patent that they claim covers the 1-click shopping idea, sued Amazon for patent infringement.  The court case will take place in the second half of 2009.[http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432339946]
 
In 2006 Cordance Corp., who have an earlier patent that they claim covers the 1-click shopping idea, sued Amazon for patent infringement.  The court case will take place in the second half of 2009.[http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432339946]
 +
 +
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 +
* [[Litigation and specific patents]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 18:08, 16 August 2009

Amazon's "one-click shopping" patent became infamous both because it's trivial and because it's clearly a business method.

Status in various regions

Prior art

In response to Tim O'Reilly's $10,000 bounty for anyone who could find prior-art to invalidate the 1-click patent, contributors found existing patents on: [1]

  • 1-click TV shopping[2]
  • the use of a remote data terminal to place orders[3]
  • single-action ordering during radio broadcasts[4]

In 2006 Cordance Corp., who have an earlier patent that they claim covers the 1-click shopping idea, sued Amazon for patent infringement. The court case will take place in the second half of 2009.[5]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References