ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "Amazon's one-click shopping patent"

(Related pages on {{SITENAME}}: * Webpage and e-commerce patents)
({{navbox}})
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Amazon]]'s "'''one-click shopping'''" patent became infamous both because it's [[Quality of software patents is particularly bad|trivial]] and because it's clearly a [[business method]].  It has since become an example of how impractical it can be to [[invalidate the most harmful]] even when prior-art exists.
+
{{navbox}}[[Amazon]]'s "'''one-click shopping'''" patent became infamous both because it's [[Quality of software patents is particularly bad|trivial]] and because it's clearly a [[business method]].  It has since become an example of how impractical it can be to [[invalidate the most harmful]] even when prior-art exists.
  
 
==Status in various regions==
 
==Status in various regions==

Revision as of 23:37, 30 March 2010

Amazon's "one-click shopping" patent became infamous both because it's trivial and because it's clearly a business method. It has since become an example of how impractical it can be to invalidate the most harmful even when prior-art exists.

Status in various regions

Prior art

In response to Tim O'Reilly's $10,000 bounty for anyone who could find prior-art to invalidate the 1-click patent, contributors found existing patents on: [1]

  • 1-click TV shopping[2]
  • the use of a remote data terminal to place orders[3]
  • single-action ordering during radio broadcasts[4]

In 2006 Cordance Corp., who have an earlier patent that they claim covers the 1-click shopping idea, sued Amazon for patent infringement. The court case will take place in the second half of 2009.[4]

MIT professor Philip Greenspun, who was called as a material witness in Amazon's litigation against Barnes and Noble, developed something similar or identical in 1995.[5]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References