ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "ATT v. Excel ruling by US CAFC on 14 April 1999"
('''AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc.''' (1999, USA) Cited in ESP's brief for Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA) as "172 F.3d 1352, 1356-59 (Fed. Cir. 1999)". ==Related pages on {{SITENAM) |
(This ruling is one of three which Ben Klemens argues wrongly applied the Diehr ruling by using the "as a whole" test without using the "significant post-solution activity" or "transformation") |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Cited in [[ESP]]'s brief for [[Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA)]] as "172 F.3d 1352, 1356-59 (Fed. Cir. 1999)". | Cited in [[ESP]]'s brief for [[Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA)]] as "172 F.3d 1352, 1356-59 (Fed. Cir. 1999)". | ||
| + | |||
| + | This ruling is one of three which [[Ben Klemens]] argues wrongly applied the [[Diehr]] ruling by using the "as a whole" test without using the "significant post-solution activity" or "transformation" tests. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote> | ||
| + | ''Thus, the Alappat inquiry simply requires an examination of the contested claims to see if the claimed subject matter as a whole is a disembodied mathematical concept representing nothing more than a "law of nature" or an "abstract idea," or if the mathematical concept has been reduced to some practical application rendering it "useful."'' | ||
| + | </blockquote> | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
Revision as of 09:55, 18 February 2010
AT&T Corp. v. Excel Communications Inc. (1999, USA)
Cited in ESP's brief for Bilski v. Kappos (2009, USA) as "172 F.3d 1352, 1356-59 (Fed. Cir. 1999)".
This ruling is one of three which Ben Klemens argues wrongly applied the Diehr ruling by using the "as a whole" test without using the "significant post-solution activity" or "transformation" tests.
Thus, the Alappat inquiry simply requires an examination of the contested claims to see if the claimed subject matter as a whole is a disembodied mathematical concept representing nothing more than a "law of nature" or an "abstract idea," or if the mathematical concept has been reduced to some practical application rendering it "useful."
