ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "20 years is too long"
(art 33) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{navbox}} | {{navbox}} | ||
| − | Patents last for 20 years. This term has been set by [[TRIPS]]. | + | Patents last for at least 20 years. This term has been set by [[TRIPS]] (art 33). |
Patents exist to encourage researchers to publish their ideas. The researcher gets a temporary monopoly, and in return, society gets access to the idea when the patent expires. | Patents exist to encourage researchers to publish their ideas. The researcher gets a temporary monopoly, and in return, society gets access to the idea when the patent expires. | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 11 February 2012
Patents last for at least 20 years. This term has been set by TRIPS (art 33).
Patents exist to encourage researchers to publish their ideas. The researcher gets a temporary monopoly, and in return, society gets access to the idea when the patent expires.
In software, if you have to avoid using ideas from the past 20 years, your software will be useless. (See: Use software from 20 years ago)
Similarly, it doesn't take 20 years to figure out how a software package works, so the disclosure with a 20 year delay on your freedom to use the idea, is a pointless deal. (See: The disclosure is useless)
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Slow process creates uncertainty
- Invalidating harmful patents#Takes_years - the courts system is too slow to work for software developers
- Utility models and innovation patents
External links
- An Open Letter From Jeff Bezos On The Subject Of Patents, (2001? or earlier), Jeff Bezos of Amazon suggests a 3-5 year term for software patents
- Amazon Letter from RMS to Tim O'Reilly, 11 Mar 2000, by Richard Stallman
