ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!
Difference between revisions of "2009 patent litigation study"
(→Page 7) |
(rv spam) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* "''The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years.''" | * "''The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years.''" | ||
| − | + | ===Page 7=== | |
| + | Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008. There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about [[software patents]]. | ||
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}== | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 3 August 2011
2009 patent litigation study is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses non-practising entities and damages in the USA.
Contents
Excerpts
Page 4
- "In 2008, 2,896 patent infringement actions were filed"
- Patent litigation filing is increasing 1.5 times faster than patent application filing
Pages 5 & 6
- "Damages awards for NPEs have averaged more than double those for practicing entities since 1995."
- "The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years."
Page 7
Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008. There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about software patents.
Related pages on ESP Wiki
- Studies on economics and innovation
- Rethinking the European ICT agenda, 2004, also by PriceWaterhouseCoopers
- Patent trolls
