ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "2009 patent litigation study"

(Page 4)
(Excerpts)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
'''2009 patent litigation study''' is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses [[non-practising entities]] and [[Calculating infringement damages in the USA|damages]] in the [[USA]].
 
'''2009 patent litigation study''' is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses [[non-practising entities]] and [[Calculating infringement damages in the USA|damages]] in the [[USA]].
  
==Excerpts==
+
IJWTS wow! Why can't I think of thigns like that?
 
 
Short, sweet, to the point, FREE-exactly as information shuold be!
 
 
 
===Pages 5 & 6===
 
* "''Damages awards for NPEs have averaged more than double those for practicing entities since 1995.''"
 
* "''The median damages award for patent holders who are NPEs was more than triple the award for practicing entities over the last seven years.''"
 
 
 
===Page 7===
 
Chart 2C is a list of damages awards exceeding $100 Million: 2005 to 2008.  There are ten cases; four or five of them seem to be about [[software patents]].
 
 
 
Whvoeer wrote this, you know how to make a good article.
 
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 10:00, 3 August 2011

2009 patent litigation study is a 24-page publication by PriceWaterhouseCoopers which discusses non-practising entities and damages in the USA.

IJWTS wow! Why can't I think of thigns like that?

External links