ESP Wiki is looking for moderators and active contributors!

Difference between revisions of "2008 Berkeley Patent Survey"

(External links: ** [http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-ii-of-iii.html Patenting by Entrepreneurs (Part II of III): three additional)
(more info from the patently-o articles)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{navbox}}
 
{{navbox}}
The '''2008 Berkeley Patent Survey''' showed that [[venture capitalists]] are not interested in [[software patents]] and that [[SMEs]] over estimate the importance of having patents.
+
The '''2008 Berkeley Patent Survey''' showed that [[venture capitalists]] are not interested in [[software patents]] and that [[SMEs]] over estimate the importance of having patents.  The paper was published in the [[USA]] by [[Robert Merges]], [[Pamela Samuelson]], [[Ted Sichelman]], and [[Stuart Graham]].
  
The paper published in the [[USA]] by [[Robert Merges]], [[Pamela Samuelson]], [[Ted Sichelman]], and [[Stuart Graham]].
+
==Major findings==
  
The study found that while 97% of venture-backed startups in biotech have patents, only 67% of venture-backed software startups do, and among all software starts (regardless of their source of financial backing) the number drops to 25%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-i-of-iii-1.html|title=Patenting by Entrepreneurs: The Berkeley Patent Survey (Part I of III)|quote=As expected, this figure varies widely by industry—for example, 97% of venture-backed biotechnology companies hold patents or applications, while only 67% of venture-backed software startups do. And among the general population of software startups responding, the rate was only about 25%.}}</ref>  This information was used in [[EFF]]'s [[Bilski v. Kappos]] brief<ref>http://www.eff.org/files/EFF%20etc%20amicus%20brief.pdf</ref>
+
In a three-part series, authors Merges and Samuelson highlighted key findings.
  
There's more interesting info in the abstract.
+
The study found that while 97% of venture-backed startups in biotech have patents, only 67% of venture-backed software startups do, and among all software starts (regardless of their source of financial backing) the number drops to 25%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-i-of-iii-1.html|title=Patenting by Entrepreneurs: The Berkeley Patent Survey (Part I of III)|quote=As expected, this figure varies widely by industry—for example, 97% of venture-backed biotechnology companies hold patents or applications, while only 67% of venture-backed software startups do. And among the general population of software startups responding, the rate was only about 25%.}}</ref>  This information was used in [[EFF]]'s [[Bilski v. Kappos]] brief.<ref>http://www.eff.org/files/EFF%20etc%20amicus%20brief.pdf</ref>
 +
 
 +
From an article written by two of the authors:
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>
 +
''Among software companies, the results are even more striking, with them reporting that patents provide less than a "slight" incentive.''<ref>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-ii-of-iii.html</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
==Related pages on {{SITENAME}}==
 
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 
* [[Studies on economics and innovation]]
 
* [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 
* [[Statements from venture capitalists]]
 +
* [[Why software is different]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 19:55, 20 July 2010

The 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey showed that venture capitalists are not interested in software patents and that SMEs over estimate the importance of having patents. The paper was published in the USA by Robert Merges, Pamela Samuelson, Ted Sichelman, and Stuart Graham.

Major findings

In a three-part series, authors Merges and Samuelson highlighted key findings.

The study found that while 97% of venture-backed startups in biotech have patents, only 67% of venture-backed software startups do, and among all software starts (regardless of their source of financial backing) the number drops to 25%.[1] This information was used in EFF's Bilski v. Kappos brief.[2]

From an article written by two of the authors:

Among software companies, the results are even more striking, with them reporting that patents provide less than a "slight" incentive.[3]

Related pages on ESP Wiki

External links

References

  1. "Patenting by Entrepreneurs: The Berkeley Patent Survey (Part I of III)". http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-i-of-iii-1.html. "As expected, this figure varies widely by industry—for example, 97% of venture-backed biotechnology companies hold patents or applications, while only 67% of venture-backed software startups do. And among the general population of software startups responding, the rate was only about 25%." 
  2. http://www.eff.org/files/EFF%20etc%20amicus%20brief.pdf
  3. http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2010/07/patenting-by-entrepreneurs-the-berkeley-patent-survey-part-ii-of-iii.html