en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

November 2014: About Microsoft’s patent licence for .NET core

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits


Patent ownership does not imply political support

From en.swpat.org
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub. You can help en.swpat.org by adding to it.

Why do software companies apply for patents?

Contents

[edit] Ownership does not imply support for software patents

Some companies own software patent because they acquired them when they purchase another company.

[edit] Arms race

As Lord Justice Jacob wrote in the Aerotel v. Telco (2006, UK) decision:

If your competitors are getting or trying to get the weapons of business method or computer program patents you must too. An arms race in which the weapons are patents has set in.


[edit] Businesses feel obliged

I've never been a big fan of the broad swath of business method patents and even less of a fan of the process for creating and litigating patents. That said, it's the world we live in. So, like every other Silicon Valley entrepreneur, I file patents. [1]

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

[edit] External links

[edit] References

  1. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110822/13094215621/what-idiot-wrote-patent-that-might-invalidate-software-patents-oh-wait-that-was-me.shtml


This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)