User talk:173.55.11.198
I4i case summary
Hi,
Thanks for the summary, it looks right. Some references would be good, so that others can confirm the statements or find further info. Just if you have some handy.
I have to focus on something else right now but I'll be back to working on the wiki at the end of June. I probably won't be able to work on a reaction to the court's decision :-(
Ciaran 18:33, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify him/her. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
