The win-win patent myth

Some software patent advocates say that, as long as newness and innovativeness are sufficiently examined, patents are always a win-win because when the patent is published, you can choose to license the idea, or you can continue to develop your software without the idea, in which case you've lost nothing compared to before the patent was published.

This is wrong for the following reasons:

• Firstly, the patent may cover a file format or a standard which your users expect. If you're writing a video player, and the most widely used format on the Internet is Mpeg h.264, then the patents held by MPEG LA are a problem. If you boycott the patented ideas needed for that format, then your video player will not be useful for playing videos.
• Secondly, the patented idea might be independently developed by another software developer before the 20-year expiration date of the patent is reached.

Related pages on en.swpat.org

• Some SMEs like software patents myth
• Protecting small inventors myth
• Patent standards here are higher than in the USA

This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see: >> EndSoftwarePatents.org - main site << >> News: news.swpat.org << This wiki is publicly-editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)