en.swpat.org is a wiki.   You can edit it.   May contain statements End Software Patents does not endorse.

November 2014: About Microsoft’s patent licence for .NET core

SitemapCountriesWhy abolish?Law proposalsStudiesCase lawPatent office case lawLawsuits

Halliburton ruling by UK High Court on 5 October 2011

From en.swpat.org
Jump to: navigation, search

This article documents the first High Court ruling, in 2005, and the second ruling on 5 October 2011.


[edit] The decisions

On 21 July 2005, the High Court ruled "Both patents are invalid in their entirety for insufficiency".[1] (citation: [2005] EWHC 1623 (Pat))

However, on 5 October 2011, a judge ruled that the rejection of the patents could be appealed (and stated that the patents were valid). (citation: [2011] EWHC 2508 (Pat))

[edit] The 2011 ruling

[edit] The decision itself

30. [...] An invention which makes a contribution to the art which is technical in nature (to echo Kitchin J’s words in Crawford) is patentable even if it is implemented entirely on a computer and even if the way it works is entirely as a result of a computer program operating on that computer. The outcome of the Symbian case proves that.
(See also: The Symbian rulings by UK Court of Appeal - 2007-2008)
72. [...] Although obviously some mathematics is involved, the contribution is not solely a mathematical method (on top of being a computer program) because the data on which the mathematics is performed has been specified in the claim in such a way as to represent something concrete (a drill bit design etc.).

[edit] Related pages on en.swpat.org

[edit] External links

[edit] The 2011 decision

[edit] The 2005 decision

[edit] References

  1. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2005/1623.html

This wiki is part of the End Software Patents (ESP) campaign (donate). For more information, see:
>> endsoftwarepatents.org (Main ESP website) <<
>> endsoftwarepatents.org/news (News) <<

This wiki is publicly editable. (See: en.swpat.org:About) It's a pool of information, not a statement of ESP's views or policies, so no permission is required. Add your knowledge! (See: Help:How to make a good contribution)